http://vitals.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/10/18/8381786-kids-under-2-should-play-not-watch-tv-doctors-say
I feel as though children under 2 should be allowed to watch a limited amount of TV. It should also be educational and nothing with vulgar language or explicit images. The TV media can get children to learn to say vulgar terms or grow up with violent thoughts and images, simply because of the TV images they have in their minds. Children should have more educational interactions with parents by learning words on flash cards, playing games, etc. They have the rest of their life to watch TV, there is no need to start them off getting them addicted so young.
Tuesday, October 18, 2011
Do sexy classes really help distract from the normal workouts?
http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/44937180/ns/today-today_health/#.Tp2lWt4r2so
I think the sexy workout classes using poles, burlesque, and striptease really do work better, especially for women. For men, it seems like it takes them no time to go from fat and flabby, to cut and rip. For women, however, it feels like an eternity just to lose 10 pounds. I think more women should at least try to do the sexy workout classes because of all the strengthening it does for the body, as well as for weight loss. This will also be something nice to take home to the significant other, so it is a win-win situation. I do not see where people would lose out on at least trying it.
I think the sexy workout classes using poles, burlesque, and striptease really do work better, especially for women. For men, it seems like it takes them no time to go from fat and flabby, to cut and rip. For women, however, it feels like an eternity just to lose 10 pounds. I think more women should at least try to do the sexy workout classes because of all the strengthening it does for the body, as well as for weight loss. This will also be something nice to take home to the significant other, so it is a win-win situation. I do not see where people would lose out on at least trying it.
Tuesday, October 4, 2011
Should/Shouldn't the porn industry force their workers to be protected?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42897073/ns/health-sexual_health/#.Tos99J4k6so
People do not take the porn industry serious or they look down upon the individuals that take part in it. However, people do no realize that this is a multi-billion dollar industry that has been around for several years and will not leave any time soon. The poor industry brings in a large amount of revenue for the economy, which is one reason it will not go away. This industry is a very dangerous job to obtain. The risk for diseases and STDs are higher in the porn industry because of the lack of unprotected sex just for more viewers. When these actors do get diseases, they still need to be treated like normal individuals with respect and care. With the closing of the LA clinic due to improper care, this may raise more cases of STDs and infections in that area. I feel like two things should happen, clinics with highly trained and devoted doctors, nurse practitioners, and nurses should be built in areas where porn is being produced to ensure proper care and reduce the possible spread of disease. If this cannot be done, I feel like the porn industry managers should at least enforce a rule about these actors wearing condoms during all taping to reduce infectious diseases spreading. By the managers doing so, would show the actors that they do not only care about the money, but they care about their employees lives as well.
People do not take the porn industry serious or they look down upon the individuals that take part in it. However, people do no realize that this is a multi-billion dollar industry that has been around for several years and will not leave any time soon. The poor industry brings in a large amount of revenue for the economy, which is one reason it will not go away. This industry is a very dangerous job to obtain. The risk for diseases and STDs are higher in the porn industry because of the lack of unprotected sex just for more viewers. When these actors do get diseases, they still need to be treated like normal individuals with respect and care. With the closing of the LA clinic due to improper care, this may raise more cases of STDs and infections in that area. I feel like two things should happen, clinics with highly trained and devoted doctors, nurse practitioners, and nurses should be built in areas where porn is being produced to ensure proper care and reduce the possible spread of disease. If this cannot be done, I feel like the porn industry managers should at least enforce a rule about these actors wearing condoms during all taping to reduce infectious diseases spreading. By the managers doing so, would show the actors that they do not only care about the money, but they care about their employees lives as well.
Should/Should not sperm banks have a limit on donors?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44399494/ns/health-childrens_health/
I personally feel there should be a limit to how many offspring that one donor's sperm can have. As stated in the article, if the children find out they have 50+ half siblings, it will make them wonder if they have ever came in contact with them or even simply want to meet them. This can be difficult news to find out because most people do not think they could have so many siblings that they know nothing about and have never met. Putting a limit on the amount of kids will also reduce confusion and headache on the donor. If the donor finds out they have 100 kids and those children show up one day wanting to know why he never contacted any of them, it may be a difficult situation for everyone to handle. The best way to keep down confusion would be to limit the amount of offspring allowed per donor, no matter who they are.
I personally feel there should be a limit to how many offspring that one donor's sperm can have. As stated in the article, if the children find out they have 50+ half siblings, it will make them wonder if they have ever came in contact with them or even simply want to meet them. This can be difficult news to find out because most people do not think they could have so many siblings that they know nothing about and have never met. Putting a limit on the amount of kids will also reduce confusion and headache on the donor. If the donor finds out they have 100 kids and those children show up one day wanting to know why he never contacted any of them, it may be a difficult situation for everyone to handle. The best way to keep down confusion would be to limit the amount of offspring allowed per donor, no matter who they are.
Isn't or Isn't Tweeting considered cheating?
http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/43318545#.Tos5HZ4k6so
I feel as though tweeting should be considered cheating because cheating is mainly defined as doing something you wouldn't normally do around your significant other. If someone is living another life outside their day-to-day life, then it becomes an infidelity issue. Especially for married people, there is actually no reason to be tweeting people at all. There is no need to tell the public your every move, or state problems that are going on in the marriage and they are affecting the person. I understand when someone is not getting that attention they need in their relationship, they will use virtual methods to fill their desire of being wanted. This method, however, is not appropriate and can ruin lives. It is very easy for people to get caught up in the virtual life but in the end, they need to realize that there is a difference between affecting a life that is in front of you and affecting a life through the phone or on the computer.
I feel as though tweeting should be considered cheating because cheating is mainly defined as doing something you wouldn't normally do around your significant other. If someone is living another life outside their day-to-day life, then it becomes an infidelity issue. Especially for married people, there is actually no reason to be tweeting people at all. There is no need to tell the public your every move, or state problems that are going on in the marriage and they are affecting the person. I understand when someone is not getting that attention they need in their relationship, they will use virtual methods to fill their desire of being wanted. This method, however, is not appropriate and can ruin lives. It is very easy for people to get caught up in the virtual life but in the end, they need to realize that there is a difference between affecting a life that is in front of you and affecting a life through the phone or on the computer.
Friday, September 16, 2011
Parents should or should not be laid-back
I know that laid-back parents are making things worse because I see it everyday when children are running around everywhere like they have no home training. It has been too much of "sparing the rod" and has led to upbringing of destruction. If parents never get on to their children, how will they ever know right from wrong? They can't if the parent just says "No Billy" or "Stop that". Nothing will ever change and the world will eventually full of chaos because the control ended.
People should or should not do in-home-botox
I felt that it is good that doctors are trying to warn people about doing in-home-botox treatments because we all know that they are on the rise. People would rather spend less money just to look beautiful, even with all the risk. If Americas thinks that risk of dying is beauty, then we are in even more trouble than ever imagined.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)